If a player has bid 3, and he and his partner take 4 or 5 tricks, they count 3 only. If they are euchred, failing to make the number of tricks bid, the adversaries count the number of points bid. Fifteen points is usually the game. This is probably the root of the much better games of five and seven-handed Euchre, which will be described further on. PROGRESSIVE EUCHRE. This form of Euchre is particularly well suited to social gatherings. Its peculiarity consists in the arrangement and progression of a large number of players originally divided into sets of four, and playing, at separate tables, the ordinary four-handed game. _=Apparatus.=_ A sufficient number of tables to accommodate the assembled players are arranged in order, and numbered consecutively; No. 1 being called _=the head table=_, and the lowest of the series _=the booby table=_.
For instance: Let this be the arrangement of eight players in the first set:-- b f a 1 c Hands 1 to 4. e 2 g d h If _=a=_ and _=c=_ take 34 tricks E & W; _=e=_ and _=g=_ taking only 30 with the same cards, either _=a=_ and _=c=_ must have gained them, or _=e=_ and _=g=_ must have lost them. It is a waste of time to put down both losses and gains, and all that is necessary is to call the top score zero, and charge all players with the loss of as many tricks as their total is short of the top score. In this case we charge _=e=_ and _=g=_ with a loss of 4 each. It must be obvious that _=f=_ and _=h=_ have also made 4 more tricks than _=b=_ and _=d=_; and that the latter must be charged with a loss of 4 on the same hands that _=e=_ and _=g=_ lose on. We give as an illustration a sheet balanced in this way, showing the losses of the various players. The totals at the end of the match show that _c_ is the winner, losing less tricks than any other player. [Illustration: +-------+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ |Players| a | b | c | d | e | f | g | h | |-------+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ |Set 1 | - | 4 | - | 4 | 4 | - | 4 | - | | +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ | 2 | - | 2 | - | 2 | - | 2 | - | 2 | | +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ | 3 | 5 | 5 | - | - | - | - | 5 | 5 | | +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ | 4 | 1 | - | - | 1 | 1 | - | - | 1 | | +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ | 5 | - | - | 3 | 3 | - | - | 3 | 3 | | +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ | 6 | - | - | - | - | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | | +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ | 7 | 4 | - | - | 4 | - | 4 | 4 | - | +-------+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ |Totals | 10 | 11 | 3 | 14 | 8 | 9 | 19 | 14 | +-------+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ ] _=Large Numbers of Individuals.=_ Several ingenious methods have been devised for handling large numbers of players, especially in domestic parties; Safford and Mitchell having both distinguished themselves in this line. The simplest form has been suggested by Mitchell, and is especially adapted for social gatherings of ladies and gentlemen.